\
 

Benchmarking compares our accomplishments to what we hoped they'd be when we wrote our 2006' Mission Statements and Strategic Action Plans!

This is my report to CUNA Mutual on Chapter III - Customizing RMA data sheets to the UK movement and writing effective RMA reports and follow-up correspondence to confirm the implementation of level #1 recommendations.   

Risk Management Learning Center
Report Chapter III - By Rich Woldt CEO The Risk Management Learning Center 12-18-06

Click here to return to chapter III

Our RM project goals included customizing data sheets to Great Britain and the Island of Ireland, expanding data sheets as needed with high gain questions, and writing quality RM reports.  Administration performance goals include: setting RMA production targets, establishing record keeping standards, and adopting strategies to answer RM questions and resolve RM disputes.

Steve has established the required administrative files to include the retention of data needed to write reports and/or defend RM recommendations. Steve's written reports appear to be well written and identify RM concerns, explain why they are a concern, and make clear and appropriate recommendations. Steve also has achieve a high level of compliance with the expected number of follow-up contacts. While I rated Steve's administration skills "C" during the last benchmarking, this time he deserves a "B" rating.

 Steve has developed an excellent style that puts our customer at ease while he leads them through the risk analysis. It appears Steve has mastered the burglary, robbery, and internal control analysis. I did not observe him conducting the fidelity analysis but listened while he answered a number fidelity type questions. I have no doubt Steve is well grounded in the fidelity analysis. Steve's hands on experience with Supervisory Committee and Regulatory Audits equips him well to perform all of our fidelity analysis. Refer to Chapter II on RM R&D for suggested web sites, white papers, and resources for expanding our current fidelity analysis to include plastic card, money laundering, wire transfer, and scam related high gain questions for 2007.
 Based on a number of process improvement Steve has made, to include the creation of puddles, using his digital camera to document security features, etc. I rate Steve's accomplishments in this area as B+ or well above average.          
Process improvement in data sheets and written reports:  While I'm recommending we migrate to electronic data sheet and surveys, I strongly recommend Steve maintain a hard copy master file of all recommendation and standard answers. These will serve not only as a learning tool for new hires, but a tool for us to use when updating data sheets in other CM markets.
While hard copy data sheets have served us well in the past, I recommend we convert as many as possible to an electronic format. I'll work with Steve on the design and contact so as to manage risks associated with collecting, transmitting, sorting, and storing exposure and security information. For example, we can use key codes when completing online surveys to conceal exposure information.

Rich Woldt

 

 

Data Sheet' Process Improvements 2007: 

Data sheets help us focus on important risks, remember what to recommend when we write reports, and provide some defense if a recommendation is ever challenged. Other than that, hard copy data sheets take time to complete, are hard to keep current, contain facts that can quickly change, and create a storage problem both from a standpoint of space and security. Hard copy data sheets are also hard to short, hard to analyze, and even harder to share with others. While we'll always need data sheets, I recommend we test a program that uses interactive surveys we can use to collect, sort, analyze, and share pertinent information. This would allow underwriters and claims personnel in Wisconsin, Great Britain, and Ireland ready access to data sheets and for that matter written reports and other correspondence. For example, click here to review and complete a sample Risk Analysis Survey and click here to view your response.

This is a test survey I've just launched so any responses were either self created or created by Steve and I during the benchmarking week. 

Other tools I suggest we consider include an excel spread sheet (click here) we'd use to focus on risk and exposure concentrations.

Refer to chapter II on RM Research and Development for assistance in developing a "Plastic Card" Risk Analysis (PC-RMA) a "Wire Transfer" Risk Analysis (WT-RMA) and other electronic risk analysis. There is also a tutorial for electronic crime risk analysis in the RM Manual for Great Britain. I've left word with Ann Davidson to channel current information on plastic card security to me but have not received anything from her. I've also talked with our US risk management personnel (Vince Wagner) who indicated the analysis used when writing the GB manual is the same as that being used in the US today. I've also made contact with Master Card Risk Management International asking for updates to be forwarded to me. 

Library of RMA data sheets:  Click here to enter a library of RMA data sheets, standard recommendations, and tutorials for each. All data sheets currently being used should be updated to include the high-gain questions Steve now is asking relative to plastic card, checking, and ATM security. In my opinion, Ireland is a major embezzlement loss waiting to happen. I recommend Steve concentrate as soon as possible on training John to do the "Fidelity Analysis" with special emphasis on fictitious and unauthorized loans, identity theft, fraudulent deposits, new account frauds, and the appropriate internal and audit controls recommended for both.